Showing posts with label Gurudas Dasgupta. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gurudas Dasgupta. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Indian Economic Crisis – the Root and the Effect- A.B.Bardhan

Something akin to that has indeed occurred in the last few days. Sensex figure has plunged precipitately shedding more than a couple of thousand points. Rupee, the national currency of India, the symbol of its sovereignty and stability has collapsed. It fell head over heels in relation to the dollar. At the time of writing it has come down to
Rs 68.80 a dollar. Then it appreciated a bit, but there is no knowing what new depths it will plumb. Managers of the economy are hoping that it will find an ‘appropriate level’ at an ‘appropriate time’.
Indian economy is in deep crisis. Nobody can now deny or ignore this fact, hoping that the ominous signs will disappear and things will be back to normal.
 The rate of growth which touched 8.5 for some time and which the government touted as the second highest in the world has come down to less than 5 per cent. It is in fact hovering between 4 and 5 during the year 2012-2013, and in the quarter April to June 2013, it came down to 4.4 per cent, the lowest in 4 years.
 Communist Party of India (CPI) MP Gurudas Dasgupta poured out figures in Parliament to underline the depth of the economic crisis. The Index of Industrial production which is key to economic growth was 1.1 per cent in 2012-13 but it declined to – 1.6 per cent in May 2013 and then went down further to – 2.2 in June 2013. The decline continues unabated. In the service sector this is only 6.6 which is the lowest in last 11 years. In agriculture, the mainstay of our economy the rate of growth is only 1.1 per cent while the population continues to grow at 2 per cent. Consumption has gone down by 3.3 per cent since people don’t have money even to eat.
  The foreign exchange reserve, which was 300 billion dollars, has now come down to 275 million dollars. This is sufficient only for a few weeks or so. India is on the brink of insolvency. The shadow of 1991 hangs over the country. The prime minister has assured us that it is not so. After all India of 2013 is not the India of 1991.
For people of his thinking–i.e. the bourgeois elite, even the Food Security Bill, which has just gone through the Lok Sabha, is to be blamed. They consider every measure that is orientated to bring a modicum of relief to the poor as “populist”, an act of financial profligacy, as something that throws the country’s finances out of gear and spells disaster. They do not think so when a “package” is announced to bail out big business and corporates or when concession, are handed out to them. That according to them are necessary steps to stimulate the economy.
 Yet, in 2010-11 alone the corporate tax foregone was nearly Rs. 58,000 crore. In 2012-13 the estimated tax gone is Rs. 68,000 crore.
 It is true that the currency was devalued also in Brazil, Indonesia, South Africa, and Turkey among the newly emerging economies. But the rupee is the front-runner in a race to the bottom.
 The men who run our economy have no clue to the crisis that has overwhelmed them. Finance Minister Chidambaram is out to find alibis when he shifts the blame on others. He has also blamed his ‘predecessor’ for the financial mess knowing that his predecessor is in no position to reply.  Now that the American economy is on the recovery trail, he cites that as a reason for our disaster since capital is flowing out there for investment.
The country is witnessing a bout of sparring between the Finance Minister and the Governor of Reserve Bank of India (RBI). Mr Subarao, RBI Governor, has in a recent remark observed, “I do hope Chidambaram will one day say: I am often frustrated by RBI, so frustrated that I want to go for a walk, even if I have to walk alone. But thank God, the RBI exists.”
In the process of this economic tsunami the Indian people have suffered a loss of more than 2 lakh crores.
The present crisis in India is not an isolated phenomenon. Capitalism is in crisis. The world capitalist system is going through a prolonged recession. The European Union has been passing through a recession for over three years. Countries like Greece, Portugal, Spain, Italy are the main scapegoats of this downturn. The rate of unemployment in Greece has already reached the astounding figure of 27.6 and even three or four bailout packages have not been able to restore normalcy.
America itself had been going through a crisis beginning with the sub-prime loan crisis four year back, which witnessed the collapse of a number of American banks and financial institutions. The U.S. market shrunk putting pressure on exports from emerging economies like India. With the current signs of recovery in the U.S. the financial liquidity that has been set in motion by the U.S. Federal Reserve has led to a sudden out load of billions of dollars from countries like India, Indonesia and so forth, depreciating their currencies. The US pushes the effect of both its recession and its recovery on to the countries of the capitalist periphery.
Each country suffers the effect in its own specific way following from the economic policies that its government has been pursuing. In India the fiscal deficit and the current account deficit which coincided caused the precipitate fall in the stock exchange and the decline and volatility in the value of the rupee. It further unleashed speculative pressure on the prices of commodities in the market, both of gold on the one hand and vegetables on the other. 
Even Ratan Tata, who is close to the Indian ruling circles, was forced to remark that India has lost the confidence of the world. He also said that the Government was ‘swayed’ by vested interests in the private sector and policies had been changed, delayed and manufactured. Since Tata himself is ‘a vested interest in the private sector’ it will be interesting to know from him who is the vested interests he is pointing at.
 The CPI had initiated a debate on the economic crisis in Parliament on August 7, 2013. Gurudas Dasgupta charged, the country is facing an economic tsunami because of the reckless policies of the government. Non- performing government has generated a dangerous crisis, which is almost an economic disaster thanks to their incapacity and inability….. The livelihood of millions have been affected and crores of jobs have disappeared, while farmers were also in grave distress.”
What solution does the Finance Minister have to overcome the present crisis? Chidambaram begins by asserting, what we need now is not less reforms, but more reforms, not more restrictions but less restrictions, not a closed economy but a more open economy.” The 10-point plan that he has proposed to drag the economy out of the mess is a reflection of this resolve.
The first step in this direction is to stabilize the rupee about which there seems to be no positive proposal.
 The crisis is not a sudden development. It is not a bolt from the blue. We from the Left have been pointing towards all the portends that have eventually brought on the crisis. We have drawn attention. We suggested measures and campaigned for them so as to bring down inflation. The government persisted in taking steps which further fuelled inflation. Repeated hikes in the prices of diesel and other petroleum products were allowed to be taken. There is even talk of a further hefty rise in these prices. They are only kept pending because the crisis overtook any such step.
How did Chidambaram react to the devaluation of the rupee? While acknowledging that some government steps have contributed to the devaluation of rupee, he went on to blame the judiciary for barring or putting an elaborate process for mining, environmental clearance and land acquisition. He admitted that the government had allowed the fiscal deficit to be breached and current deficit to swell because of certain decisions. They were allowed to be taken.
 We demanded that measures should be taken against closure of many industries and manufacturing units which was causing tremendous job losses. Unemployment figures including lack of jobs for educated and qualified youth were soaring.
 The government talks of reforms. But what kind of reforms? The Left has been demanding land reforms, which should mean distribution of land to the landless that helps restoring the agrarian economy. The bourgeois landlord dispensation has baulked taking any such basic reforms. Our aim should be to create a people- friendly socio- economic order in the country.
It necessary to curb imports, particularly of luxury goods, and such goods that are manufactured in the country. At the same time all efforts have to be made to increase India’s exports with a view to ease the balance of payments in the country. The outflow of dollars has to be substantially reduced.
A spate of investments whether public or private has to take place in industries which contribute to job creation, and in the education and health spheres. The emphasis has to be on mobilizing domestic resources (which we do not lack) and domestic capital. Foreign capital is welcome, but it can play only a supplementary role. The objective is to improve the livelihood of our people which alone can be the basis of our future development. Development strategy borrowed from abroad, neo-liberal or any other, cannot help.
A decline in the basic parameters of the economy may be followed by occasional signs of recovery, which will no doubt be hailed by the beleaguered government spokesmen. But the main thing is the stabilization of the economy at some time in the future.
It is important to invest in people. At a time when it is essential to add to the purchasing power of our people, the government is engaged in further restricting the people’s capacity in the name of cutting down on expenditure. This always affects the poorer and toiling sections since what is curtailed is the social security outgo and the subsidies In fact the Left is pressing for fixing the minimum wage at a reasonably higher figure. At the same time Left is demanding pension to all elderly citizens at the rate of Rs.3000 per month.
 The crying need is to reverse the neo- liberal policies pursued at present, which only maximizes the profit of Big Business and Corporate houses, while condemning the majority to poverty and deprivation. Today a situation has emerged where the economic policies are dictated by the corporates for the benefit of the corporates. As long as that persists there may be marginal and occasional recovery while the general downturn and depression continues.
The fall in the value of the rupee, the chaos in the stock-market, the general decline in the economy, and the uncertainty and instability that prevails in the country has its political fall-out that threatens the democratic polity of our country. This requires a separate treatment.

Monday, September 2, 2013

Gurudas Dasgupta's latest letter to the PM on the natural gas price increase scam to favour Reliance.





2/9/2013

Dear Dr. Manmohan Singh ji,
You would kindly recall the issue of gas price revision of RIL operated KG-D6 basin that I had raised in my earlier letters to you. You are also aware that the Finance Ministry has asked Petroleum ministry to examine the issue of pricing the shortfall quantities of gas at the old rate of $4.2 per mmbtu and the categorical rejection of this suggestion by the Petroleum Minister.
It has appeared in the press that the Petroleum Ministry has revised its earlier stand and has now circulated a Cabinet note to the effect that RIL shouldn’t get revised price on gas till the reasons for the fall in output are ascertained. It is further learnt that the Petroleum Ministry has proposed that if it reaches the conclusion that the fall was due to geological difficulties, then they would be allowed the benefit of the price increase to RIL.
The formulation of the Cabinet note in this fashion has again exposed the duplicity of the Petroleum Minister. You would recall that the government has consistently rejected the contention of RIL that the shortfall is due to geological difficulty. I would like to quote from the notice issued by the Government to RIL when cost recovery of $ 1 billion was sought to be disallowed in May 2012:
" You have failed to fulfill your obligations and to adhere to the terms of the PSC and are in deliberate and willful breach of PSC and have thereby caused immense loss and prejudice to the government.
As against the aforesaid required 31 wells to be drilled by April 2012 in accordance with the amended IDP, till date you have completed the drilling of only 18 wells and even out of these 18 wells, only 12 wells are presently in operation.
Your breach of PSC including failure to adhere to and comply with the Amended IDP have resulted in heavy loss of production of gas thereby causing loss to the Government and of scarce natural resource to the nation. You are not entitled to the recovery of costs incurred by you for the excess capacity created in block KG-DWN-98/3 and such recovery of costs has to be limited only to the extent of the infrastructure used by you for the production of the gas."
I may also add that this opinion was reached in consultation with Director General of Hydrocarbons ( DGH), the technical arm of the Petroleum Ministry. In fact the DGH wrote as many as seven letters between December 2010 and April 2011 pointing out the lapses on part of RIL and rejecting its contention of geological uncertainty. This was further re-iterated in the Management Committee meeting dated 17/3/2011. The same conclusion was also reached by the one man expert committee of Dr P Gopalkrishnan, a reservoir expert, who submitted his report to the Petroleum Ministry in April 2011. I must also point out that the Petroleum Ministry has also answered a number of questions in the Parliament wherein it rejected the claim of RIL regarding geological uncertainty.
Trying to re-open this issue, which had been conclusively settled by the previous Petroleum Minister, is a thinly disguised attempt to dilute the earlier stand of the government that the shortfall was on account of deliberate malfeasance of RIL. You are already aware that the present Petroleum Minister has deliberately stalled the arbitration proceedings for the recovery of the penalty of $ 1 billion. By trying to reverse the earlier view of the government, he is trying to weaken the arbitration proceedings and give an alibi to RIL to get away with its grave breach of the PSC.
Further, the Petroleum Minister has chosen not to consult the Fertiliser and Power ministries on this Cabinet note. Not consulting the biggest user ministries further shows the mala fides of the minister, to take a decision by stealth, without proper inter- ministerial consultation.
Since the Government has already taken a view that RIL had deliberately reduced production, the obvious conclusion has to be that the shortfall quantities have to be supplied at the old rates.I would like to re-iterate the financial benefits to the country if this decision were enforced. The shortfall in production in the years 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 against approved targets are 5 mmscmd, 28 mmscmd, 55 mmscmd, 66 mmscmd respectively. This means that the total shortfall over the last four years is a mammoth 154 mmscmd. If this quantity of natural gas were supplied at the old rate of $4.2 per mmbtu instead of the revised rate of $8.4 per mmbtu recently fixed by the government, this would mean a saving of $4.2 per mmbtu. Simple calculations show that for a total of 154 mmscmd of gas and a total price decrease of $4.2 per mmbtu would translate into a total saving of Rs. 63,000 crore for the country. I would request the government to insist that RIL supply the shortfall quantity at the old rates to ensure that their sinister design of deliberately reducing production does not result in windfall profits for them.
I earnestly re-iterate that the government insist that RIL supply the shortfall in gas production at the old rates. I would also request that the government reconsider the decision to raise prices of natural gas and keep it in abeyance until these issues are openly debated with all stakeholders.

With kind regards,
Yours sincerely,

(Gurudas Das Gupta)

Dr. Manmohan Singh,
Prime Minister,
South Block,
New Delhi-110001.

Sunday, September 1, 2013

'Very sceptical' about PM's statement on economy: Gurudas Dasgupta

New Delhi,August 30,2013
of () leader Gurudas Dasgupta on Friday said he was ' very sceptical' about Prime Minister Dr. 's statement on the present economic crisis, which will be made before the House today, and expressed that he did not think that the statement would have any immediate impact on the market.
"I am very sceptical because only two days back the Finance Minister made a statement. Therefore, I do not expect anything surprising from him. I do not think he will say anything which will immediately provoke any response in the market," Dasgupta said.
Dasgupta also predicted that the Prime Minister would focus his statement on the 'micro-management', like Finance Minister P. Chidambaram, instead of addressing the grassroot concerns of the people living through the economic meltdown.
"What the Finance Minister has said, he will harp on the same lines. The Finance Minister is very, very, clever. He was talking about the micro-management, about the CAD, about the fiscal consolidation-but the basic human problems that you are facing, regarding the price rise, regarding the job loss, regarding the retrenchment, regarding the instability in the market (was not talked about)," Dasgupta said.
"Spending more is the only solution, but they are not doing it. In fact, they are contracting; they are squeezing the expenditure," he added.
Meanwhile, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kamal Nath on Friday raised hopes for Dr. Manmohan Singh's Parliamentary address on the state of the country's economy, and assured that the Prime Minister's speech would boost the economic situation in the country.
"The Prime Minister knows the economy better than anyone else and I'm sure his speaking in Parliament and telling the people of this country will have a message which will give a boost to the economy," Nath said.
Facing an attack over the economic situation amid a sliding rupee, Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh told the Parliament on Thursday that he would make a statement on the state of the economy on Friday.
"It cannot be denied that the country is facing a difficult economic situation... I do not deny that there are some domestic factors. But there are also international factors arising out of the change in the US economic stance," Dr. Singh said.
"There are also problems created due to tensions that are on the horizon in Syria and they have inevitable consequences for oil prices. I will be happy to make a statement tomorrow (Friday)," he added.
Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley raised the issue as soon as the Rajya Sabha met for the day, and demanded a statement by the Prime Minister outlining the steps that the Congress-led UPA II Government is contemplating to tackle the present economic situation.
He then took a dig at Finance Minister P Chidambaram's 10-point suggestions, saying it was just a "discourse in economic theory" when the country was actually moving towards stagflation.
Chidambaram had earlier on Tuesday suggested a 10-point formula to revive the country's economic situation, and sought co-operation from all quarters despite ideological and political differences.
Chidambaram, who was replying to a discussion on the country's economic situation in the Lok Sabha, said the country needs more reforms, lesser restrictions and an open economy.
The Finance Minister said the fiscal deficit would be contained at 4.8 percent of the GDP even after doling out subsidies for the implementation of the Food Security Bill.
He said the government is doing everything to boost investment.
Chidambaram also underlined the need to encourage manufacturing in sectors like power, steel, automobiles and textiles.
"We must increase production of electronics and textiles. We are importing things which we should not have imported. India can be strong only if we have a strong manufacturing economy," he said.

Friday, August 23, 2013

CPI's Dasgupta questions $8.4 an mBtu gas price













Communist Party of India () leader on Thursday again trained guns on the Centre for the gas price rise.
In a letter to Prime Minister , Dasgupta alleged the cost of production for Ltd (RIL)’s block was just $ 2.74 a million British thermal unit (mBtu). He added the Rangarajan pricing formula would give them a windfall gain through a pricing of $8.4 an mBtu.

Dasgupta asked Singh to revisit the pricing of by the , applicable from April 2014. Citing petroleum ministry figures, Dasgupta said the ministry had admitted that after computing from the financial statement of RIL in 2011-12 on projected level of production, the cost of production, including levies, worked out to $2.74 an mBtu.“If the cost of production is only $2.74, how has Rangarajan come to the conclusion that it should be $8.4 per unit to be given to the contractor? Evidently, it is a case of lack of due diligence,” the letter said.

Earlier, Dasgupta had filed a public interest litigation regarding the decision on gas pricing at the apex court, on which the response from the petroleum ministry, RIL and minister M Veerappa Moily would be heard on September 6.


 http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/cpi-s-dasgupta-questions-8-4-an-mbtu-gas-price-113082200883_1.html

Monday, July 1, 2013

The gas price rise is without merits: Gurudas Dasgupta



Interview with CPI leader in Busines Standard :

, a Communist Party of India senior, has been at the forefront in opposing a rise in the price of natural gas, on the ground that the real beneficiary is Ltd (RIL). He explains his stand to Sanjay Jog. Edited excerpts:

What is your comment on the Centre's decision to increase the gas price from April 1, 2014?
Disastrous. Why was the pricing done in dollars when imported coal is not being so priced? Linking it with the dollar means the contractor will be the beneficiary. This was done during the BJP-led NDA government and the UPA government is continuing that line. In the wake of a declining exchange rate, the country will lose heavily and disproportionately.

Why are you opposing it?
The government has agreed to double the price without any scientific study of cost of production per unit, what has been the actual revenue and the profit. It is reported that the contractor has recovered much more that what was invested. Further, the government did not study the impact on the two main users, the fertiliser and power sectors.

The increase in the price of power per unit will involve more subsidy from the states. Stakeholders are not consulted and the government has taken the decision without due diligence. The government has responded to arm-twisting methods of corporate entities. Our battle will continue in and outside Parliament.

Do you stick to your earlier observation that the gas price rise is a scam?
Certainly. In view of the collusion between companies and the petroleum ministry, we have seen that a petroleum minister was removed in the past. Also, the timing: the deal has been struck on the eve of elections. It is a known fact that this corporate (read RIL) is generous in making political investments.

The finance minister said the rise was due to low domestic output.
A villain's argument. It will further accentuate price rise, will increase the electricity cost, spur the industrial cost of production and will ultimately be placed on the shoulders of consumers.

What were the options to avoid a gas price rise?
Why rely on a single contractor? As per the production sharing contract, the government should have taken control of the area in which the contractor had failed to produce. The government should have made the allocation of that area to other contractors, through international competitive bidding. That would have substantially reduced our dependence on a single contractor, as there would have been many more contractors. However, the government is deliberately allowing monopoly of a single contractor.

Do you want government to reconsider its decision?
The defaulting contractor (RIL) should have been put under pressure to produce the 80 million standard cubic metres a day of gas as promised in the contract. Instead, it has taken the statement of a single contractor as correct and decided to increase the gas price. It is the government's job to protect the interest of the country and also its natural resources.

The government has clearly defaulted in discharging its constitutional duty. It will have to review its decision and the rise in price must be done only after a proper technical evaluation.

Friday, September 7, 2012

Gurudas Dasgupta's Note of dissent on present economic situation


Communist Party of India (CPI) parliamentary group leader and CPI National Council secretary Gurudas Das Gupta has said that the UPA-II government has miserably failed over the years to stimulate inclusive growth and rather did not succeed even to maintain the rate of GDP growth attained earlier, which is today at an all-time low of 5.3 per cent.  It could not even hold the price line mainly of the essential commodities including food articles.

The veteran parliamentarian, also the AITUC general secretary, made these observations in his dissent note on the report of the parliamentary standing committee on finance concerning the present economic situation, submitted on August 29, 2012.

Unfortunately, the standing committee’s draft report as prepared failed to critically examine the fundamentals of the economic policy and suggest effective alternatives instead objectively approved the policy that has been pursued by the government, he said.  “It does not even refer to the futility of the policies and non-performance of the government.  In my view, the committee did not discharge its responsibility by patting on the back of the government.”

Saying that the present crisis cannot be attributed solely to the international crisis, second in two years, Dasgupta said that the present policy of unguarded liberalisation, reckless privatisation, unusual dependence on foreign funds, over dependence on export market, failure to curb speculation in a situation of scarcity, its total inability to provide economic empowerment to a vast section of the majority of the people, galloping disparity of income and increasing unprecedented concentration of wealth in the hands of the few form the basic negative feature that has been overlooked by the committee. 

The report speaks of economic incentive regime for accelerating and sustaining growth.” It also states that “the committee, hence recommend that the FDI policy may be reviewed by the government to ensure the above and make India an increasingly attractive and investor-friendly destination for foreign investors.” It further says: Our policies should attract more long-term capital inflows and push investments through reforms.

Thus, the CPI group leader pointed out that the observations clearly approve the government of Indias FDI-friendly policy of economic reform, spelling out the undeniable message that it is the foreign investment that will engineer the process of accelerated economic growth obviously taking care of the basic human problems. “This proposition has not been found to be correct anywhere in the world.  The committee rejecting all the Indian realities, by implication seeks to strengthen the hands of the government to bulldoze its people-unfriendly economic reform.  The report will give a free hand to the government to allow FDI in the retail trade, further tax concession to the corporates in the SEZs, it will lead to more violation of labour laws and enable the government to infuse FDI in the banking and insurance having proportionate voting rights.  In the name of attracting foreign funds it will bestow more concessions undermining the national interest, making India the most attractive hunting ground for the international players looking for unlimited profits exploiting national resources and manpower.”
 
             Stating that primarily the growth of the economy depends on national resources augmenting progressive tax revenue, broadening the tax base, reducing the tax concession, holding up tax avoidance, by waging all out war to retrieve black money, curbing unaccounted income, effectively fighting corruption and reducing wasteful expenditure and relocating priorities in the process of budget making, he said that nobody is denying the role of FDI in  national development, which by all means is subsidiary. 
               The direction of the report, which is extremely flawed is stereotyped and does not search for alternative policy which the nation is looking for. There is no word for stimulating the domestic market, enlarging the empowerment of the marginalised majority.

              The report in the background of the agricultural crisis does not call for heavy public investment in agriculture, only asks for infusion of fundswithout indentifying the source of funds.  While investment in agriculture has been dwindling down over years, both public and private, the report does not “look beyond the nose, makes a superfluous comment on the need of infusion of funds, which is unlikely to happen.” 

“Nevertheless it is correct to say that private investment has a crucial role in a mixed economy like India.   But in a situation of gloom and downturn, it is massive government investment targeted to augment the income of the common people, for creating job, ensuring stability of income of the disadvantaged, even incurring budget deficit can turn around the economy.  Heavy government investment will stimulate the market, generate the income, improve aggregate demand and as a result market shall look up creating the atmosphere for the inflow of profit oriented private investment, even draw foreign funds.  Unfortunately, the alternative perception is ignored and discarded by the Report and in fact it strengthens the hands of the government to carry forward the present anti-people economic policies”, the dissent note adds.
 
Criticising the government for recommending the sale of family silver to meet the grocers bill, he said that the report suggests disinvestment for raising revenue, when the market sentiment is so negative. “The Committee unfortunately goes so far as to suggest 10 per cent reduction in the non-plan expenditure which essentially suggests to reduce subsidy obviously hurting the common people.  This is quite in line with what the present government wants to do.  In the name of quoting RBI, the report puts on record with concern the question of overshooting of subsidies.”

The committee, he says, “even refers to with concern the impact of retrospective tax lawsand general anti-tax avoidance rules. It calls upon the Government to modify/withdrawal these laws so that investorsinterest is not hurt.  It calls upon the government for the speedy enactment of the financial reform Bill including Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, the Companies Law Amendment Bill.  The report undoubtedly shall be a feather in the cap of Dr Manmohan Singhs government.”

The report in the name of strengthening the health of the banks “seeks to permit the government for going for merger of the banks undermining the national interest.  It also opens the door for private investment in banks diluting its public sector character.”
              Since the report is one sided, seeks to strengthen the hand of the government in pushing through all its corporate friendly reform programme at the cost of the interest of the people, since the report does not locate the fundamental anachronism in the economic policy that has led to a situation of slowdown and food inflation, almost taking the country to the threshold stagflation, since the report is in fact an apology for the inaction of the government and since the report does not find any fundamental flaw in the policy and refrains from outlining people friendly suggestions Dasgupta made it clear that he has no other alternative but to put on record his dissent.  “It is unfortunate that the report is likely to serve as a readymade weapon in the hand of the government to defend its failed economic policy running the country.”